DỰ BÁo nhu cầu và ngân sách sử DỤng thuốc arv tại việt nam (2011 2015)



tải về 376.53 Kb.
trang5/5
Chuyển đổi dữ liệu02.09.2016
Kích376.53 Kb.
#30787
1   2   3   4   5

4. KÕT LUËN Vµ KHUYÕN NGHÞ

NhËn thøc vµ kiÕn thøc cña PNMD ®èi víi hµnh vi t×nh dôc an toµn lµ kh¸ ®Çy ®ñ, bao gåm hiÓu biÕt vÒ nguån l©y vµ c¸ch phßng ngõa l©y truyÒn HIV/AIDS. §ång thêi, PNMD còng ®· cã hµnh vi tèt trong viÖc sö dông bao cao su khi QHTD víi kh¸ch hµng. Tuy nhiªn, vÉn cßn mét sè PNMD cã xu h­íng chñ quan khi cã QHTD víi kh¸ch hµng th­êng xuyªn, ®Æc biÖt lµ khi kh¸ch hµng trë thµnh b¹n t×nh th­êng xuyªn th× hä hÇu nh­ kh«ng sö dông bao cao su. §iÒu nµy cho thÊy cÇn ®Èy m¹nh h¬n n÷a ho¹t ®éng truyÒn th«ng, trong ®ã tËp trung vµo néi dung 100% sö dông bao cao su, cho dï kh¸ch hµng ®ã lµ ai, PNMD cÇn lu«n lu«n sö dông bao cao su ®Ó tr¸nh bÞ l©y nhiÔm bÖnh.


TµI LIÖU THAM KH¶O

  1. Bé Y tÕ, 2005-2006, KÕt qu¶ Ch­¬ng tr×nh gi¸m s¸t kÕt hîp hµnh vi vµ c¸c chØ sè sinh häc HIV/STI (IBBS) t¹i ViÖt Nam.

  2. Bé Y tÕ, 2008, B¸o c¸o c«ng t¸c can thiÖp gi¶m t¸c h¹i trong dù phßng l©y nhiÔm HIV

  3. Bé Y tÕ, 7/2008, B¸o c¸o c«ng t¸c gi¶m t¸c h¹i trong dù phßng l©y nhiÔm HIV.


Controlling HIV epidemics among injection drug users:

Seven years of Cross-Border HIV prevention interventions, Vietnam and China


Theodore M. Hammett, Ph.D.

Abt Associates Inc.

Hanoi, Vietnam
Don C. Des Jarlais, Ph.D.

Beth Israel Medical Center

New York, N.Y. USA
Ryan Kling, M.A.

Abt Associates Inc.

Cambridge, Massachusetts USA
Janet McNicholl

Punneeporn Wasinrapee

CDC/Thai Collaboration on HIV/AIDS

Bangkok, Thailand


Wei Liu, M.D.

Yi Chen, M.D.

Guangxi Center for Disease Control

Nanning, China




Kieu Thanh Binh, M.D.

Abt Associates Inc.

Hanoi, Vietnam
Meng Donghua, M.D.

Ning Ming County Health Department

Ning Ming City (Guangxi), China
Doan Ngu, M.D., M.P.S.

Abt Associates Inc.

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Nguyen Huu Tho, M.D.

Lang Son Provincial HIV/AIDS Center

Lang Son City, Vietnam
Hoang Ngoc Quyen, M.D.

Hoang Van Tren, M.D.

Ha Giang Provincial Health Services

Ha Giang, Vietnam



August, 2010




Background

As in many parts of the world, especially in Eastern Europe and Asia, the HIV epidemics in Vietnam and in Southern China are driven by injection drug use. There have been various small-scale interventions for injection drug users (IDUs) launched in Vietnam and China since the late 1990s and the governments of both countries have been generally supportive of harm reduction approaches such as peer outreach, needle/syringe programs (NSP), and opioid substitution treatment (OST), the effectiveness of which have been well-established by research from around the world (Institute of Medicine, 2007). Nevertheless, Vietnam has not yet scaled up NSP and most such interventions in the country are still supported by international donors, a situation that cannot be sustained as donor support is phased out when Vietnam achieves middle-income status. China does have a substantial government-supported network of needle/syringe programs but overall coverage remains low.


Since 2002, the Cross-Border Project has implemented high-coverage HIV prevention interventions , for IDUs, including peer outreach and NSP in Lang Son Province, Vietnam and Ning Ming County (Guangxi), China, and since 2003 in Ha Giang Province, Vietnam. While few such harm reduction interventions in Vietnam and China have been systematically evaluated, our Cross-Border Project has a strong evaluation component whose results add to the already strong evidence base.
Audiences and Methods:

This report is addressed to HIV/AIDS policy makers, program implementers and researchers.

Figure 1 shows the geographic setting and sites of the Cross-Border Project.

Figure 1: Cross-Border Project Sites


The interventions involve peer outreach and needle/syringe distribution, directly and through redemption of pharmacy vouchers. This was the first time identical interventions have been implemented on both sides of an international border.
The project’s peer educators are recruited and supervised by local health departments. The interventions directly reached 60%-70% of IDUs in the sites but are considered structural in that even greater numbers were positively affected and the government and general community were very supportive. Evaluation of the Cross-Border interventions employs serial cross-sectional surveys of IDUs (behavioral interviews and HIV testing) with sampling by modified “snowball” method and 250-300 respondents per wave, resulting in one of the longest data series on IDUs in Asia. This is an appropriate method for structural interventions. Primary outcomes were HIV risk behaviors, HIV prevalence and incidence. We used 2 methods to estimate HIV incidence: 1) HIV+ new injectors (LTE 3 years) from prevalence data, assuming HIV- at start of injection history and seroconversion halfway from start of injection to survey date; 2) BED testing of HIV+ samples (only 36-84 month available for Lang Son).
Results

Analysis of demographic characteristics of respondents in the IDU surveys (data not shown) revealed that in all sites they were overwhelmingly male, largely between 21-30 years old (although there was some tendency for the samples to age over time), and about two-thirds were single. Ethnic minorities contributed substantial percentages to these IDU samples: usually 70%-80% in Ning Ming, 45%-60% in Lang Son, and 40%-60% in Ha Giang.


We found significant declines to low levels in drug-related risk behaviors (receptive and distributive sharing of needles/syringes, sharing of drug solution, and sharing of any injection equipment). Figure 2 shows reductions in HIV prevalence among IDUs (Lang Son: 46%-23% [p< 0.001], Ning Ming:17%-11%[p=0.003], and Ha Giang : 51%-15% [p.0.001]).
Figure 2: HIV Prevalence Trends

New injector analysis revealed significant declines to low levels in HIV incidence through 36-48 month follow up surveys, but then some apparent rebound. BED-based estimates revealed significant reductions in incidence through 84 months. 95% confidence intervals were narrower for the BED-based estimates than for the new injector-based estimates. Figure 3 shows the incidence trends by the 2 estimation methods.



Figure 3: HIV Incidence Trends







Findings and Recommendations

The consistent downward trend in behavioral and biological outcome measures suggests a positive effect of this structural intervention. The apparent rebound in new-injector based incidence estimates in later surveys may reflect infections through sexual contact prior to initiating injection. BED-based estimates may exaggerate incidence because of false positive results among individuals with long-term or late stage HIV disease but surrogate survey responses on duration of infection appear to confirm the BED results in our surveys. In addition, the 95% confidence intervals are wider for the new injector-based than for the BED-based incidence estimates. The apparent increase in the BED-based incidence estimate for Ha Giang from 60 months to 72 months is within the 95% confidence band and remains lower than the new-injector based estimates.


In sum, the combined trends from the 2 incidence estimation methods show sharp declines in incidence to low levels, indicating that the Cross-Border interventions have played an important role in bringing the HIV epidemics among IDUs under control in our sites and offer a model of HIV prevention for IDUs that is worthy of large-scale replication.



tải về 376.53 Kb.

Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn:
1   2   3   4   5




Cơ sở dữ liệu được bảo vệ bởi bản quyền ©hocday.com 2022
được sử dụng cho việc quản lý

    Quê hương