33
Figure 22 Actual placement
schedule for Mujib dam
Figure 23 Temperature contour at the end of placement, Jan. 2002
34
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
10
15
20
25
30
Temperature (deg C)
E
leva
tio
n
(
m
)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Time (days)
T
e
m
p
e
ra
tu
re
(
d
e
g
C)
Conventional
approach
Actual approach
Figure 24 Temperature contour, April 2002
Figure 25 Vertical temperature distribution along surface wall of gallery (at 7.6 m
from upstream) after end of casting for actual placement schedule
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Time (days)
T
e
m
p
e
ra
tu
re
(
d
e
g
C)
Fiber optic 23.59 m from U/S
ANSYS model (Actual approach)
ANSYS model (Conventional approach)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Time (days)
T
e
m
p
e
ra
tu
re
(
d
e
g
C)
Fiber optic 23.59 m from U/S
ANSYS model (Actual approach)
ANSYS model (Conventional approach)
Figure 26 Predicted temperature distribution at level 158 mASL (15 m from base of
dam) and 19.5 m from upstream (Centroid)
Figure 27 Comparison of temperature distribution at Level 145.5 m ASL
36
Figure 28 Comparison of temperature distribution for 90 days at Level 145.5 m ASL
Level 149.7 m ASL, Cross Section St. 0+906.2
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Distance From Upstream Surface [Metres]
T
e
m
p
e
ra
tu
re
d
e
g
(
C)
19/6/02 10:51 Fiber optic
Thermocouples 26.9.2002 150mASL
Ansys model 19/6/02
Figure 29 Cross section temperature distribution at level 149.7 m ASL (remove
thermocouples distribution from graph as it is completely different date)
37
Level 158.1 m ASL, Cross Section St. 0+906.2
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Distance From Upstream Surface [Metres]
T
e
m
p
e
ra
tu
re
d
e
g
(
C)
19/6/02 9:54 Fiber optic
Thermocouples 26.9.2002 159mASL
Ansys model, 19/06/02
Figure 30 Cross section temperature distribution at level 158.1 m ASL (same
comment as above)
View publication stats
View
publication stats