Synthesis of design and construction practices


Table 3.  Design Thicknesses for CBM Base for More than 80,000,000 ESALs



tải về 1.81 Mb.
Chế độ xem pdf
trang15/42
Chuyển đổi dữ liệu13.04.2022
Kích1.81 Mb.
#51624
1   ...   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   ...   42
09-cr2
[123doc] - phat-trien-nguon-nhan-luc-cua-cong-ty-co-phan-misa-doc
Table 3.  Design Thicknesses for CBM Base for More than 80,000,000 ESALs 

 

Foundation Class 



CBM Base 

Class 1 

50 MPa 

(7,250 psi) 

Class 2 

100 MPa 

(14,500 psi) 

Class 3 

200 MPa 

(29,000 psi) 

Class 4 

400 MPa 

(58,000 psi) 

CBM3G 

275 mm 


(10.8 in) 

250 mm 


(9.8 in) 

225 mm 


(8.9 in) 

200 mm 


(7.9 in) 

CBM4G 

220 mm 


(8.7 in) 

200 mm 


(7.9 in) 

180 mm 


(7.0 in) 

150 mm 


(5.9 in) 

CBM5G 

200 mm 


(7.9 in) 

180 mm 


(7.0 in) 

160 mm 


(6.3 in) 

150 mm 


(5.9 in) 

CBM3R 

220 mm 


(8.7 in) 

200 mm 


(7.9 in) 

180 mm 


(7.0 in) 

150 mm 


(5.9 in) 

CBM4R 

200 mm 


(7.9 in) 

180 mm 


(7.0 in) 

160 mm 


(6.3 in) 

150 mm 


(5.9 in) 

CBM5R 

165 mm 


(6.5 in) 

150 mm 


(5.9 in) 

150 mm 


(5.9 in) 

150 mm 


(5.9 in) 

 

Table 4.  Properties of CBM 



CBM Minimum 

7-day 

Compressive Strength, MPa (psi) 

CBM1 


4.5   (653) 

CBM2 


7.0   (1,015) 

CBM1A 


10.0   (1,450) 

CBM2A 


10.0   (1,450) 

CBM3R/G 


10.0   (1,450) 

CBM4R/G 


15.0   (2,175) 

CBM5R/G 


20.0   (2,900) 

 


 11

The Danish Road Institute (Report 138) 

 

In 2004, the Danish Road Institute published a mechanistic design guide for semi-rigid 



pavements (Thogersen et al., 2004).  This mechanistic guide was developed as a result of a 

survey that showed the superior performance of pavements with CTB, especially on heavily 

trafficked pavement sections.  In order to understand the behavior of such pavements and 

establish a mechanistic design, a full-scale test on six semi-rigid pavements (three different types, 

each with two replications) was carried out.  A generalized incremental-recursive model based 

on tensile strain at the bottom of the CTB layer was chosen as the desired approach to verify the 

deterioration model (Thogersen et al., 2004).  The results were then compared to existing semi-

rigid pavements that had been in service for more than 20 years.  The comparison of these results 

showed that the deterioration model was accurate. 

 

 



The study focused on the failure of the semi-rigid structure in terms of fatigue of the rigid 

layer.  The determining factor in the fatigue damage was the longitudinal (tensile) strain at the 

bottom of the CTB layer.  The investigation concluded that for their semi-rigid pavement 

structure, at 75 percent confidence, the following deterministic design criterion should be used to 

prevent fatigue failure of the structure: 

 

 



 

( )


0.12

6

PERMISSIBLE



N

99 str


10

ε



= μ ×

(10)


 

 

where 



 

 

PERMISSIBLE



ε

 = maximum strain at bottom of CTB layer 

 

μstr 


= micro-strain (10

-6

 strain) 



 

N = number of load repetitions (passes) to failure. 

 

 

Once the mechanistic behavior of the semi-rigid structure was modeled, the criterion 



constants were utilized to provide designs for various traffic volumes (Thogersen et al., 2004).  

In the design table (Table 5), the load is represented as a dual-wheel load with 20 % dynamic 

load additions as used in the new Danish design standards. 

 



 12

Table 5.  Semi-rigid Pavement Design for the Danish Road Institute (Thogersen et al., 2004) 


tải về 1.81 Mb.

Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn:
1   ...   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   ...   42




Cơ sở dữ liệu được bảo vệ bởi bản quyền ©hocday.com 2024
được sử dụng cho việc quản lý

    Quê hương