ii
DISCLAIMER
The project that is the subject of this report was done under contract for the Virginia
Department of Transportation, Virginia Transportation Research Council. The contents of this
report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the
data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the
Virginia Department of Transportation, the Commonwealth Transportation Board, or the Federal
Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
Any inclusion of manufacturer names, trade names, or trademarks is for identification purposes
only and is not to be considered and endorsement.
Each contract report is peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Research Council
staff with expertise in related technical areas. The contractor performs final editing and
proofreading of the report.
Copyright 2008 by the Commonwealth of Virginia.
All rights reserved.
iii
ABSTRACT
Composite pavement systems have shown the potential for becoming a cost-effective
pavement alternative for highways with high and heavy traffic volumes, especially in Europe.
This study investigated the design and performance of composite pavement structures composed
of a flexible layer (top-most layer) over a rigid base. The report compiles (1) a literature review
of composite pavement systems in the U.S. and worldwide; (2) an evaluation of the state-of-the-
practice in the U.S. obtained using a survey; (3) an investigation of technical aspects of various
alternative composite pavement systems designed using available methodologies and
mechanistic-empirical pavement distress models (fatigue, rutting, and reflective cracking); and
(4) a preliminary life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) to study the feasibility of the most promising
composite pavement systems.
Composite pavements, when compared to traditional flexible or rigid pavements, have the
potential to become a cost-effective alternative because they may provide better levels of
performance, both structurally and functionally, than the traditional flexible and rigid pavement
designs. Therefore, they can be viable options for high volume traffic corridors. Countries, such
as the U.K. and Spain, which have used composite pavement systems in their main road
networks, have reported positive experiences in terms of functional and structural performance.
Composite pavement structures can provide long-life pavements that offer good serviceability
levels and rapid, cost-effective maintenance operations, which are highly desired, especially for
high-volume, high-priority corridors.
Composite pavements mitigate various structural and functional problems that typical
flexible or rigid pavements tend to present, such as hot-mix asphalt (HMA) fatigue cracking,
subgrade rutting, portland cement concrete (PCC) erosion, and PCC loss of friction, among
others. At the same time, though, composite systems are potentially more prone to other
distresses, such as reflective cracking and rutting within the HMA layer. Premium HMA
surfaces and/or reflective cracking mitigation techniques may be required to mitigate these
potential problems.
At the economic level, the results of the deterministic agency-cost LCCA suggest that the
use of a composite pavement with a cement-treated base (CTB) results in a cost-effective
alternative for a typical interstate traffic scenario. Alternatively, a composite pavement with a
continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) base may become more cost-effective for
very high volumes of traffic. Further, in addition to savings in agency cost, road user cost
savings could also be important, especially for the HMA over CRCP composite pavement option
because it would not require any lengthy rehabilitation actions, as is the case for the typical
flexible and rigid pavements.