Life-Cycle Cost Analysis
A life-cycle cost analysis was performed, following VDOT guidelines, to evaluate the
feasibility of composite pavement systems and to estimate their cost-effectiveness.
BACKGROUND
Composite pavements have been studied for many years. They are known as semi-rigid
pavement structures (NCHRP, 2004), premium composite pavements (Von Quintus, 1979;
Hudson and Roberts, 1981), long-life pavements (Nunn et al., 1997), and flexible composite
pavements (Nunn, 2004).
A composite pavement structure is defined as a structure comprising two or more layers
that combine different characteristics and that act as one composite material (Smith, 1963). The
two most commonly used materials that compose this composite structure are a flexible layer
(e.g., HMA) and a rigid layer (e.g., PCC, cement-treated base [CTB], cement stabilized base
[CSB], rolled-compacted concrete [RCC], or lean mix concrete). There is no single definition
applicable to composite pavements because an HMA overlay on a CTB can be considered a
composite pavement; likewise, a thin PCC overlay on an HMA layer, known as whitetopping,
has also been considered a composite pavement. Furthermore, a PCC surface layer applied on
top of another PCC layer before the bottom layer has set may be considered a composite “wet on
wet” pavement. In this study, the composite pavement system investigated was a rigid base
overlaid with a flexible layer as shown in example cross-sections in Figure 1.
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: |