by the seventh day, the day for worship. And all of this happens in the context of a
creation story that tears down false and demeaning pagan ideas about both God and man.
To hear this story within its own poetic meter, our ears must be re-tuned to catch the
subtleties of the poetic language that seeks to capture the grandeur of a God who calls the
world into existence for no other reason than his gratuitous love (
Catechism No. 293).
A
CT
2:
T
HE
F
ALL
Two Complementary Stories
The first creation story is a majestic
poem that paints, in broad strokes, the creation
of the entire world, with God saving his best work for last: the creation of man and
woman at the story’s climax. Given such a complete picture, most
modern readers are a
bit surprised to find yet another creation story. Even more perplexing is that this second
story, using a very different style, gives a quite different ordering of events than the first.
This raises the obvious question: “Why begin Genesis with two
stories of creation,
especially if they seem to be at odds with one another?”
Insight into ancient Hebrew storytelling techniques has led to a newfound
appreciation for the sophistication of biblical narratives. For example, Jewish scholar
Canaan Brichto suggests that the juxtaposition of two stories was not an uncommon
occurrence in ancient biblical narratives. Brichto calls this the “synoptic-resumptive”
technique, in which the first story looks at the big picture in a brief overview (“synoptic”),
while the second story resumes (“resumptive”) and retells the first in more detail, focusing
on its climactic elements. The two stories each
have a distinct focal point, working
together like a camera that uses one lens for a panoramic big picture and another to zoom
in for a close-up. The two stories, although strikingly different
in perspective, are
complementary and belong together, just as the different perspectives of the camera
create a sense of greater focus and interest.
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: