10
1982, p. 41) which also can be referred to as canonical tag questions, e.g., “It
is
going to rain tomorrow, isn‟t it?” and the other type is “grammatically simple
tags” (Holmes,
1982, p. 41) which can be refereed to as invariant tag questions such as “right
and okay”. The syntactic form o f canonical tag questions involves an auxiliary
verb that agrees with the host sentence in tense and number, a pronoun, and
matching or contrasting polarity. The form ofthe canonical tag question should
agree with the subject and the auxiliary of the
preceding host sentence in
number, gender and tense. On the other hand,
the invariant tag question
involves words, such as “right”, “eh”, “okay” and “yeah” and does not have to
change its form to agree with gender, number or tense o f the host sentence.
The invariant tag question is less formal than the canonical tag question.
Sometimes these invariant tag questions are referred to as response elicitors or
response getters because they aim to elicit a response from the listener or
promote interaction in the conversation (Biber et al., 2002).
This study adopts Holmes‟s (1982) categorization o f tag questions. So, in
this study canonical tag question will be used to refer to the grammatically
complex tag forms and invariant tag question will be used to refer to tag words
such as “right and okay”. (Al-Nabtiti, 2013, p. 9)
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: