A. S. Santoso, et al.
Heart Sci J 2022; 3(2): 10-17
16
Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Kardiovaskular Indonesia. Pedoman
tata laksana sindrom koroner akut. Edisi ke-4. Jakarta: PERKI;
2418.
Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C,
Bueno H, Caforio AL, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S,
Hindricks G. 2017 ESC Guidelines for
the management of acute
myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment
elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial
infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the
European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European heart journal.
2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-77.
Bohula E, Morrow D. ST-elevation myocardial infarction: manage-
ment. Dalam: Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO, editors. Braunwald’s
Heart Disease: a Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Edisi ke-11.
Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2018
Guo, Q., Huang, J., Shen, Y. et al. The role of late reperfusion in
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction:
a real-world retrospec-
tive cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 24, 247 (2424). https://-
doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-01479-0
Chotechuang Y, Phrommintikul A, Kuanprasert S, et al. Cardiovas-
cular outcomes of early versus delayed coronary intervention in low
to intermediate-risk patients with STEMI in Thailand: a randomised
trial. Heart Asia 2419;11:e011241. doi:10.1136/hearta-
sia-2419-011241.
Huo Y. Current status and development of percutaneous coronary
intervention in China. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2410;11(8):631–3.
JW Wu, H Hu, D Li, LK Ma. In-hospital outcomes of delayed stenting
in hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment elevation
myocardial infarction: the CCC (Care for Cardiovascular Disease in
China) project. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2419;9(5):462-471 |
http://dx.doi.org/10.31037/cdt.2419.08.10.
Kofoed, K. F., Kelbæk, H., Hansen, P. R., et al. Early Versus Standard
Care Invasive Examination and Treatment of Patients With
Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. 2418; In
Circulation (Vol. 138, Issue 24, pp. 2741–2750).
Ovid Technologies
(Wolters Kluwer Health). https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationa-
ha.118.037152
Ki, Y.-J., Kang, J., Yang, H.-M., Woo Park, K., et al. Immediate
Compared With Delayed Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for
Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
correlated with higher in hospital mortality. They were also more likely
to have anterior lesions and tend to develop in hospital complications.
30
Our study also found that patients with LAD lesion exerted higher
mortality rate compared to other culprit lesions (table 4.3). However
from multivariate analysis we were able
to conclude that treatment
groups were the single most significant predictor contributing to
mortality with adjusted HR of 4.506 (P 0.00). Adjusted HR for
treatment group was substantially higher compared to other significant
factors related to mortality eg. KILLIP Class and culprit lesion (table
4.5).
Although our study provided clear evidence of positive
outcome in early PPCI strategy, there were several limitations that
could not be addressed in this study. Grouping of study subjects were
based solely on broad category of early, late, and optimal medical
therapy rather than using time series. Therefore, we were not able to
pinpoint the effect of hourly delay in the
primary clinical outcome, and
concurrently the most optimal time to perform PPCI. We also limited
our observation only during hospital stay, thus we did not measure the
long-term effect early vs delayed PPCI vs non revascularized patients in
terms of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). However, despite this
limitations we were still able to conclude that early PPCI is the most
appropriate strategy for STEMI patients to reduce in-hospital mortality
and immediate lethal cardiovascular complications.
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: