Over‑expression of SYNCRIP leads to the reduction of NS1
mRNA and protein expression
To detect whether the interaction between SYN-
CRIP and NS1 mRNA will affect the expression of
NS1, we established a cell line stably expressing
pCDNA-His-SYNCRIP, named as PK-15
SYNCRIP
(Fig-
ures
5
A, B). The cell viability assay shows that the
viability of overexpressing SYNCRIP cells was not
significantly different from PK-15 or PK-15
V
(Fig-
ure
5
C). When recombinant plasmids (pEGFP-NS1,
pEGFP-NS2, pEGFP-VP1 and pEGFP-VP2) express-
ing NS1, NS2, VP1, or VP2 were transfected into
PK-15
SYNCRIP
, PK-15 or PK-15
V
cells, the level of NS1
protein decreased in PK-15
SYNCRIP
cells, while the
protein level of VP1, VP2 or NS2 were not changed,
compared to those in PK-15 or PK-15
V
control cells
(Figure
5
D). We further tested whether transient
overexpression of SYNCRIP could also decrease NS1
levels, and found that SYNCRIP overexpression did
decrease the amount of NS1 protein in PK-15 cells
(Figure
5
E). This was consistent with the results that
the expression of NS1 decreased gradually in PK-15
cells or ST cells, with the increase of the expression
of SYNCRIP plasmid (Figures
5
F, G). Consistently, we
noted that NS1 mRNA was significantly decreased in
the cells that overexpressed SYNCRIP compared to
the cells without overexpression (Figures
5
H, I), sug-
gesting that SYNCRIP could regulate NS1 expression
at the mRNA and protein levels.
SYNCRIP regulates the ratio of NS1 mRNA to NS2 mRNA
and the replication of PPV
To investigate the function of SYNCRIP in the PPV
life cycle, we first assessed whether SYNCRIP deple-
tion affected viral entry by examining the localiza-
tion of viral capsid protein (VP) in SYNCRIP-depleted
cells after PPV infection in the presence of the trans-
lation inhibitor cycloheximide. Compared to the con-
trol, SYNCRIP knockout did not decrease nuclear VP
staining at 2 hpi (Figure
6
A), indicating that SYNCRIP
deficiency did not affect PPV entry. To investigate the
potential effect on the splice of mRNA, the mRNA lev-
els of NS2 and NS1 were measured by qPCR as shown
in Figure
6
B. Indeed, the ratio of NS2 to NS1 mRNA
decreased in PPV-infected SYNCRIP depleted cells
(Figure
6
C). As NS2 mRNA, NS3 mRNA was also
derived from the alternative splicing of NS1 mRNA seg-
ment, but we did not find a significant difference in the
ratio of NS3 to NS1 mRNA among PK-15, PK
SYNCRIP+/+
and PK
SYNCRIP−/−
cells (Figure
6
D). However, for
another viral mRNA segment, VP mRNA, which
could generate VP1 and VP2 mRNA through alterna-
tive splicing, no differences were observed between the
control and SYNCRIP depleted cells in the ratio of VP2
to VP1 mRNA (Figure
6
E). Taken together, these find-
ings revealed that SYNCRIP could regulate the produc-
tion of NS2 mRNA through alternative splicing of NS1
mRNA.
To further determine the role of NS2 in PPV rep-
lication, we used PPV infectious clone Y-PPV as the
operating platform to construct the NS2 mutant strain
using the overlap technique for site-directed mutagen-
esis (Figure
6
F), and further observed whether NS2
mutant could package into virion by transmission elec-
tron microscopy. The results show that the NS2 mutant
could package into virion (Figure
6
G), but the NS2
mutant replication rate significantly decreased com-
pared to parental PPV (Figure
6
H). To confirm whether
SYNCRIP knockout decreased viral DNA replication
via inhibition of the NS2 protein, we tested the relative
viral titer of PPV or Y-PPV
NS2−
in PK-15 cells and SYN-
CRIP deficient cells depending on whether they express
NS2 or not via infection with NS2 protein expressing
lentivirus. The results show that NS2 protein comple-
mentation significantly increased PPV production in
PK-15 cells infected by Y-PPV
NS2−
(Figure
6
I, compare
lane 2 and 3). Similarly, NS2 protein complementa-
tion also significantly increased PPV production in
Y-PPV
NS2
-infected PK-15
SYNCRIP−/−
cells (Figure
6
I,
compare lane 5 and 7). Meanwhile, we noted that PPV
replication levels were reduced in Y-PPV
NS2−
infected
PK-15 cells, PPV or Y-PPV
NS2
-infected PK-15
SYNCRIP−/−
cells, but did not show a significant difference among
these three cells (Figure
6
I, compare lane 2, 4 and 5).
Similarly, PPV replication levels did not show a signifi-
cant difference among Y-PPV
NS2
-infected PK-15 cells,
PPV or Y-PPV
NS2
-infected PK-15
SYNCRIP−/−
cells when
these cells exogenously expressed NS2 protein (Fig-
ure
6
I, compare lane 3, 6 and 7). However, PPV repli-
cation levels were higher in Y-PPV
NS2
-infected PK-15
cells, PPV or Y-PPV
NS2
-infected PK-15
SYNCRIP−/−
cells
when these cells exogenously expressed NS2 protein
as compared to those in these cells without NS2 exog-
enous expression (Figure
6
I). Taken together, these
results confirm that SYNCRIP plays an important
Page 10 of 15
Chen et al. Vet Res (2021) 52:73
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: |