27
asked to translate the words; thus they might just look the words up in a dictionary
for convenience.
Table 6 also shows that important micro-skills such as making inferences,
understanding
references, understanding discourse markers, understanding text
organization, recognizing author’s purposes
and attitudes, and summarizing are rather
under-represented in the books. For example, making inferences is dealt with in only
12 out of 257 activities, understanding
references in three activities, understanding
text organization in one activity, recognizing author’s purposes
and attitudes in two
activities and understanding discourse markers, though spelled out in the syllabus, is
not catered to at all. Summarizing skills are most often practiced at the post-stage.
The chance to practice these skills occurs only once in the while-stage.
Indeed, a close examination of the comprehension questions shows that most of
them are rather ‘straightforward’ and factual in nature, therefore requiring just literal
or surface understanding of the text. As a result,
in extreme cases, many can be
answered by coping out the sentences in the text without any real language
reproduction. Very few questions actually require processing
of the text at a deeper
level, for example, bringing different pieces of information together to give a
complete answer (i.e. summarizing), or reading between the lines (inferring,
understanding author’s attitudes and so on). This poses a serious
limitation because
real world reading involves more than just literal understanding of factual,
straightforward information (Cunningsworth 1995).
28
Table 6: Micro-skills developed through while-reading exercises and tasks
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: