11
Understanding the International Criminal Court
9. Is the ICC meant to replace national courts?
No. The ICC does not replace national criminal justice systems; rather, it
complements them. It can investigate and, where warranted, prosecute and try
individuals only if
the State concerned does not, cannot or is unwilling to do so
genuinely. This might occur where proceedings are unduly delayed or are intended
to shield individuals from their criminal responsibility. This is known as the
principle of complementarity, under which priority is given to national systems.
States retain primary responsibility for trying the perpetrators of the most serious
of crimes.
10. Under what conditions does the ICC exercise its jurisdiction?
When a State becomes
a party to the Rome Statute, it agrees to submit itself to the
jurisdiction of the ICC with respect to the crimes enumerated in the Statute. The
Court may exercise its jurisdiction in situations where the alleged perpetrator
is a national of a State Party or where the crime was committed in the territory
of a State Party. Also, a State not party to the Statute
may decide to accept the
jurisdiction of the ICC. These conditions do not apply when the Security Council,
acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, refers a situation to the
Office of the Prosecutor.
11. Is the ICC’s jurisdiction time bound?
The ICC has jurisdiction only with respect to events which
occurred after the entry
into force of its Statute on 1 July 2002. If a State becomes a party to the Statute after
its entry into force, the Court may exercise its jurisdiction only with respect to
crimes committed after the entry into force
of the Statute for that State, unless that
State has made a declaration accepting the jurisdiction of the ICC retroactively.
However, the Court cannot exercise jurisdiction with respect to events which
occurred before 1 July 2002. For a new State Party, the Statute
enters into force on
the first day of the month after the 60
th
day following the date of the deposit of its
instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession.
The
ICC can investigate and, where warranted,
prosecute and try individuals only if the State
concerned does not, cannot or is unwilling to do
so genuinely.