48 Salvatore Attardo,
Lucy Pickering,
and Amanda Baker
the case of our data, the final closing low pitch of the paratone “trumped” the pos-
sible higher pitch that might be expected for the punch line. In the data discussed
here, however, only two of the thirteen instances of humor are punch lines, whereas
all the instances of humor in Pickering et al. (2009) are punch lines. Hence the re-
sults in this study are consistent with the explanation that the position at the end of
a paratone explains the significantly lower pitch for the punch lines. Out of the two
punch lines in this study, one is much lower (40Hz) than the serious text, while the
other is in fact higher than the serious text. Given that we are considering only one
instance, it is impossible to further speculate on the significance of this fact.
We then tested whether the humorous turns might not be average in pitch,
in relation to the conversation at large, but nonetheless significantly marked in
relation to the co-text in which they occur. In order to test this hypothesis, we
compared the turn immediately before the humorous turn with the humorous
turn itself. In some cases there were two prominent syllables in the humorous turn
and we compared the second one, which was in both cases the one closest to the
jab/punch line. In two cases we had to discard a humorous turn, which occurred
immediately after another humorous turn (humor support). The results show that
there is no significant difference in pitch (the humor is on average 8 Hz higher
than the preceding turn). The actual values can be found in Table 5 below.
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: