15
‘have the limited ability to generate competitive advantage in isolation but in
combination, they can enable a firm to realize its full competitive advantage’ (Barney,
1995: 56). In other words, relying on the single HR practice with which to predict
performance is unlikely to be revealing.
It should be
clear from the previous section that there are often links between these high
commitment HR practices. For example, workers are more likely to welcome employee
involvement and information sharing if they have employment
security and their
workplace is relatively status-free. Equally, they are more likely to show an interest in
team working if their efforts are rewarded with performance-related incentives, share
ownership and access to training opportunities. Similarly, if sufficient care has been
taken at the recruitment
and selection stage, new recruits are more likely to adopt
flexible working practices and welcome team working as well as be striving for internal
promotion in the future. In isolation, or without the support of a strong organizational
culture, each of these practices can easily be dismissed as nothing more than a short-
term fad or fashion. Conversely the more that HR practices form a coherent and
synergistic bundle of related practices, it is argued, organizations are more likely to
enjoy success due to the fact that the high commitment
paradigm is more deeply
embedded into the culture of the workplace. Benson and Lawler (2003) note that
research at the work unit level confirms the importance of viewing practices as
complementary and that the high commitment model, in general,
out-performed more
traditional control oriented work systems despite the fact that the exact combination of
practices is uncertain and may be industry specific.
There is certainly a theoretical support for the notion that HR practices should operate
more effectively when combined together. For example, it could be argued that
16
extensive training is essential for self-managed teams to run effectively, or that higher
than average rewards are likely to have a positive impact on numbers of applications for
jobs. An employer may feel more inclined to promise employment security if selective
hiring has taken place, self-managed teams are extensive throughout the organization,
and rewards are contingent upon performance. Wood and de Menezes (1998)
find an
‘identifiable pattern to the use of high commitment HR practices’ and confirm that they
are being used in conjunction with each other. Similarly, despite finding a low take-up
of the high commitment model across his sample of Irish workplaces, Roche (1999)
notes that ‘organizations with a relatively high degree of integration of human resource
strategy into business strategy are very much more likely to adopt commitment oriented
bundles of human resource practices’. Guest (1997) categorises previous attempts to
examine internal fit across HR practices into three distinct groups. First, there are
criterion specific studies, such as that by Pfeffer, which outlines a number of ‘best
practices’ and suggests that the closer organizations get to
this list the better their
performance is likely to be.
The danger with such universalistic approaches is that they ignore potentially
significant differences between organizations, sectors and countries, and posit a
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: