Bruno, 2019. What Really is the American Dream? 8
The views of de Crèvecoeur (1735 – 1813) help in framing the search, and ad the fuel to
the ongoing discussions on the American Dream. As one of the original radicals of American
fundamentalism, de Crèvecoeur identifies and articulates the essence of the ideal American person
with his appeal to the unknown, and unseen, for blessed guidance for the preservation of the land
which he loved. He writes:
I beseech
Thee O Father of Nature, that our ancient virtues, and our industry, may
not be totally lost: and that as a reward for the great toils we have made on this
new land, we may be restored
to our ancient tranquility, and enabled to fill it with
successive generations, that will constantly thank Thee for the ample assistance
Thou has given them.
14
What the author is saying here is that, the divine ‘father’ of nature grants unto willing participants,
the ability to reach beyond themselves to gain that which s/he may not even be aware of. This is
more or less the guiding idea behind the aspirations of the American Dream.
de Crèvecoeur, who contributed this at a time when the essence of the American identity
was being conceived, adds that “self-preservation is above all [other] political precepts and rules,
and even superior to the dearest opinions of our minds; a reasonable accommodation of ourselves
to the various exigencies of the times in which we live.”
15
Without even knowing the spirit, one
knows, or is at least aware that something other than materialism drives human ambitions; even if
those ambitions are seemingly satisfied in, or by material manifestations.
Self actualization is
fundamentally an American ideal because it is promised through the articles of the nation’s
founding documents. The dream is therefore uniquely America, as there is hardly other such
14 . The Norton Anthology, de Crèvecoeur, 625.
15 . The Norton Anthology, de Crèvecoeur, 621.
Bruno, 2019. What Really is the American Dream? 9
written or unwritten promise of national construction which ties human livity into its structural
framing.
The interpretation of de Crèvecoeur’s statement may be seen in other lights, but he is
reflecting on the essence of
renewal by revisiting the past, and this occurred way before the
colonial experience. de Crèvecoeur was of course speaking from a front-row seat in the theatre of
divine authority, having experienced the workings of colonialism
during his teenage years in
England. After de Crèvecoeur settled in New York following a tour of duty with the Canada militia,
he found America to be a place of renewal, as was captured in his letters from an American Farmer,
quoted in preceding paragraphs.
The dream therefore can be seen as the possibilities of renewal and/or redemption. The
expressions of freedom in those early days all seem to echo the same clarion call. There had been
(and probably there still is) this prevailing sentiment hovering over the American society in the
early contacts with human realities and the challenges of renewal. Sentiments of ownership of
one’s personhood, and the ability to fend-off further negative encroachments was the modus
operandi of the early American narrative (probably it still is). Something was happening with the
American citizenry in the founding era, and it was as if it were ordained by the Great Spirits. There
were revolutionaries and there were loyalist. Revolutionaries waged aggression against loyalists
and this helped in weaving that innate sense of the togetherness spirit; a belief which strengthened
the cause of rediscovering America, and reaffirming the aspiration of the American person – not
just as individuals, but also in the collective sense.
The
English man, Thomas Paine (1737 – 1809), who is listed as “the most persuasive
rhetorician of the case of [American] independence,”
16
is one of those individuals who harbored
16 . The Norton Anthology, de Crèvecoeur, 639
Bruno, 2019. What Really is the American Dream? 10
the early American personhood. Operating in colonial America during the time of spiritual
upheaval, Paine pontificated that “it is necessary to the happiness of man that he be mentally
faithful to himself.”
17
It is, therefore, my understanding that there is an essence behind any physical
manifestation, and that essence is the spirit. This spirit is that same agency which Paine evoked to
savagely attack the insularity within ‘civility’ in his
‘Common Sense: thoughts on the Present State
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: