Monetary Theory
●
27
excess money is not so-called source of bank loans, instead they are created by
loans extended to those who lack money. Banks can
only make loans to those
who lack money, and the deposits created in this process are then scattered in
the society by the payment behaviors of those who lack money to purchase
goods or services. Thus those people with excess money
will have their deposit
assets.
6
There is no such thing as banks transfer funds from those with excess
money to those who lack it. This is because banks have a special credit status.
In the credit monetary system, banks and clients are not at the same credit level.
For clients, deposits are their assets, which can be
used for transactions with
other clients. For banks, deposits are their liabilities, and banks cannot possibly
use the deposits as a tool to trade with their clients. Therefore
banks are not the
intermediary but the source of social funds.
For clients, borrowing from banks is different from borrowing from other
clients. But this difference has nothing to do with direct and indirect financ-
ing. First of all, clients obtaining deposit
money though bank loans has
nothing to do with people who have excess money. It is a direct transaction
between the two parties. Second, the borrowing and lending tools between
clients are banks’ liabilities, which is also related to banks. Moreover, in the
“chain of indirect financing” in
the conventional money theory, there is an
asset accepted by the three parties, whereas there is no such asset in reality. The
essential difference between the two theories is the difference in levels. The so-
called direct financing is the transaction of bank liabilities between the non-
bank public, which only changes the owner of money and does not affect the
amount of money. The so-called indirect financing
indicates that banks create
money through loans, leading to an increase of money; so indirect financing
does not need to have a source of funds.
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: