WHICH SIZE TO MEASURE?
A spherical particle can be described using a single number—the diameter—
because every dimension is identical. As seen in Figure 1, non-spherical
particles
can be described using multiple length and width measures (horizontal and vertical
projections are shown here). These descriptions provide greater accuracy, but
also greater complexity. Thus, many techniques make the useful
and convenient
assumption that every particle is a sphere. The reported value is typically an
equivalent spherical diameter. This is essentially taking the physical measured value
(i.e.
scattered light, settling rate) and determining the size of the sphere that could
produce the data. Although this approach is simplistic and not perfectly accurate,
the shapes of particles generated by most industrial processes are such that the
spherical assumption does not cause serious problems.
Problems can arise, however,
if the individual particles have a very large aspect ratio, such as fibers or needles.
Shape factor causes disagreements when particles are measured with different
particle size analyzers. Each measurement technique
detects size through the
use of its own physical principle. For example, a sieve will tend to emphasize the
second smallest dimension because of the way particles must orient themselves to
pass through the mesh opening. A sedimentometer measures the rate of fall of the
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: