Studies help self
Full-time
248
3.63
2.69
.007
Part-time
998
3.51
Studies help employer
Full-time
235
3.10
1.94
.052
Part-time
984
2.98
Studies help understanding
Full-time
245
3.63
1.85
.064
Part-time
1000
3.53
Studies help work
Full-time
239
3.48
3.87
.000
Part-time
992
3.24
Ref to publications
Full-time
243
3.53
4.29
.000
Part-time
995
3.30
Generally, the full-time students obtained higher mean scores in all scales. However, the mode
of enrolment did not significantly affect their opinions about the role of their higher degree
studies in helping their schools, centre or institute get more
out of educational research
information and in helping themselves to gain a deeper understanding of what they do in their
work at p<.05. The full-time student appreciate significantly more highly the role of their
studies in raising their awareness of educational research (t=2.31, p<.05); in helping themselves
to get more out of educational research information and perspectives (t=2.69, p<.05); in
actually helping them to do better at work (t=3.87, p<.05); and in encouraging them to refer
more often to research publications or findings in the future (t=4.29, p<.05).
As for the perceptions of students towards the impact of educational research on educational
practice or planning as a
result of their degree studies, the full-time and part-time students
achieved nearly similar mean scores in all three areas: the levels of being informed, the levels
of the impact and the benefit of impact (table 11). There was
no significantly difference
between full-time and part-time students in these scales at p<.05.
Table 11.
Relationship between students’ modes of enrolment and scales
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: