The Argument over Reincarnation in Early Christianity
8
Plato teaches the punishment of the wicked for only a limited period of time
and in bodies other than their own, while Christians teach the eternal
punishment of the wicked in the same bodies as they now possess.
21
Justin says a lot in this single short sentence. He refutes the idea
of reincarnation and at the same time solidifies his belief in corporeal
resurrection. At this point in the dialogue Justin explains his belief that
Christians are judged and punished once, and not several times through
several lives. He also explains that the wicked who are being punished are
suffering for their mistakes in the same bodies that they have always had.
It is easy to see that Justin Martyr was an early Christian theologian that
did not believe in reincarnation, and when his beliefs regarding Christ’s
mission are considered it can be understood why he did not hold this
belief.
Justin explains to Trypho later in their dialogue that a Christian
seeking repentance for sins in this life can only do so “by faith through
the blood of Christ, and through his death, who died for this very
reason.”
22
It is in this teaching that we can see the main difference
between those early Christians who believed in reincarnation and those
who did not: their beliefs in Jesus Christ and what role his earthly ministry
has on all Christians. Unlike some of the Christian theologians mentioned
earlier, Justin believed and taught that Christ suffered and died so that
men could repent for their sins and avoid eternal punishment. This
difference highlights the reasoning behind the Christian Church’s decision
to reject reincarnation as a doctrine, because the idea of reincarnation
leaves to room for Jesus Christ’s redemptive powers.
21
Justin Martyr,
Dialogue with Trypho. Translated by Thomas B. Falls. (Washington
D.C., The Catholic University of America Press) 152-3.
22
Justin Martyr.
Dialogue with Trypho. 14-15.
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: |