Journal of Education and Training Studies Vol. 5, No. 6; June 2017
48
Diagram 1. Dividing the 26 state schools in the city of Kütahya forming the research population according to 2014/2015
TEOG YEP results
According to Diagram 1, the mean 2014/2015 TEOG YEP score of the city of Kütahya is 308.92 and standard deviation is
33.47. While dividing these 26 schools into sub-populations, mean and standard deviation scores were regarded as a scale.
The schools whose mean scores were higher than 2014/2015 TEOG YEP Kütahya mean score were considered successful
and those with lower scores were considered unsuccessful. The schools among the successful ones with standard scores
between 0 and +1 were classified as with “high” success and those with standard scores over +1 were classified as with
“highest” success. The same classification was done for unsuccessful schools as those with standard scores between 0 and
-1 as with “low” success and those with standard scores over -1 as with “lowest” success.
With a reference to this
classification, the 26 secondary schools in the city of Kütahya were divided into sub-populations as 5 with “highest”
success (19.23%), 5 with “high” success (19.23%), 13 with “low” success (50%) and 5 with “lowest” success (11.53%).
After this, the research sampling as chosen out of these 26 schools divided into sub-populations.
According to Diagram 1, it is seen that the overall of the schools in the sub-populations accumulated in the area with -1
mean and 0 standard deviation, while proportionally fewer schools remained between 0 and +1 and over +1 and below -1.
While choosing the school to be included into the sampling, this system was taken into account and the number of schools
representing each sub-population was determined by proportioning it to the number of schools in the population. Table 1
shows the schools constituting the research sampling, their departments and number of students.
Table 1. Success level of the schools constituting the study group and student distribution in the chosen departments.
School Success Level
Schools
2014/2015
TEOG YEP
2014/2015
TEOG YEP
Ranking
Department
f
%
Highest
School A
361.98
3
A
24
8.60
B
22
7.88
High
Elementary school sending students to school B
333.01
8
A
26
9.31
C
19
6.81
Low
School C
297.13
14
C
24
8.60
D
25
8.96
Elementary school sending students to school D 292.85
17
B
23
8.24
D
21
7.52
School E
286.07
20
A
27
9.67
D
24
8.60
Lowest
School F
260.86
25
B
28
10.03
C
16
5.37
According to Table 1, 6 schools were determined using unbiased appointment method: 1 school from 5
schools with
“highest” success rate, 1 school from 5 schools with “high” success rate, 3 schools from 13 schools with “low” success
rate and 1 school from 3 schools with “lowest” success rate. The chosen schools represent 23.07% of the schools in the
city of Kütahya. In terms of the 4
th
grade department numbers of these schools, some schools had 5, some had 4 and some
had 3 departments, so the study group was composed choosing 2 departments from each of the 6 schools because the
number of departments wasn’t equal. While choosing the departments, in the light of the information gathered from the
school administrators, great care was taken to choose the departments that represented the category of the school best. For
example, 1 out of 5 schools with “highest” success level was chosen using unbiased appointment method and became
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: