3
be used as a strategic alarm to identify contaminations or toxic spills
that could damage a water
system (e.g., the 2000 contamination of Danube River by cyanide)
Blaen et al. [2] recently assessed
“real-time monitoring of nutrients in rivers”, claiming that the
inadequate sampling frequencies result in missing pulses of nutrients during short-term events as
well as underestimation of long-term nutrient fluxes. Thus, the manner by which to extract that
information from natural resources seems not yet efficient and this may be considered a serious
issue impeding obtaining complete and reliable information on the ecosystem.
Currently, natural water reservoirs are regularly sampled and then analysed
via
centralized
laboratories. Under favourable conditions, the concentration profiles are provided in weeks. To put
this into context, once the samples are extracted, certain additives and preservatives
are added to
the prefiltered samples on the sampling platform. Then, the samples are ready to be transported
to centralized laboratories under controlled temperature and ultraclean conditions. In the
laboratory unit, certain additional pretreatments are required (e.g. adjustment of pH and ionic
strength, desalination in the case of seawater samples, centrifuging, etc.)[3] before the analysis,
which consists of using costly instrumentation, such as atomic absorption/emission spectroscopy
(AAS/AES), ion-chromatography (IC), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP
–MS),
ion analysers, spectrophotometric tests, etc., operated by a trained laboratory assistant.
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: