Key words: Ghanaian entrepreneurs, entrepreneurship development, new business start-ups, prospects and
challenges.
Challenges and Prospects for Ghanaian Entrepreneurs’
Entrepreneurship Development and New Business
Start-Ups:
AFRICA:
doi:10.18418/978-3-96043-060-5_174
175
Introduction
The advent of globalisation and neo-liberalism in the 1980s, together with the implementation of liberalisation and
deregulation policies have led to an accelerated growth in the private sector in most developing countries, and
Ghana is no exception. Hence in the last three decades, the emergence of globalization and neoliberalism or the
free market ideology, and the scale and scope of institutional support from governments, international donor
organisations and private sector financial institutions for entrepreneurs and SMEs development have increased
significantly. The increasing awareness of the problem of poverty and inequalities in the global system, coupled
with the success of microfinance initiatives elsewhere such as the Grameen bank concept, has attracted attention
worldwide and to a greater extent, encouraged entrepreneurial initiatives on a global scale to establish SMEs both
in the formal and informal sectors. This in turn, has led to considerable increase in entrepreneurship activities both
on a small, medium and large scale in various countries across the world, promoted by the free market system and
facilitated by the capitalist ideology. The increasing drive for new business start-ups is to achieve high performance
output and competitiveness for profit maximisation and help accelerate national economic growth. These
entrepreneurship trends have encouraged governments in many countries to support entrepreneurs who take the
necessary risk to set up SMEs for profit making and to contribute towards the development of the economy.
A striking difference between entrepreneurship and management is that while entrepreneurs are risk-takers and
usually more specialised in business start-ups, managers manage the business to grow and expand it. In managerial
decision making, a manager’s strategic orientation focuses on factors that are inputs in formulation of the firm’s
strategy, whereas entrepreneurial strategy is a set of decisions, actions, and reactions that generate and exploit an
opportunity to set up a new business venture. Entrepreneurial orientation toward opportunity is one’s commitment
to take action on potential opportunities and the ability to access the attractiveness of a new opportunity.
However, the two concepts and roles are complementary because some entrepreneurs have excellent managerial
and leadership skills, as some managers could also turn out to be excellent entrepreneurs. Both entrepreneurs and
managers must be proactive and learn from failures. Despite the risks involved in business start-ups, many reasons
compel people to become entrepreneurs. People with entrepreneurial mind-set has the ability to rapidly sense, act,
and mobilize resources to take advantage of opportunities, even under uncertain conditions. A potential
entrepreneur’s intention to act is based on his/her entrepreneurial intentions or motivational factors that influence
individuals to pursue entrepreneurial outcomes, coupled with their entrepreneurial self-efficacy or one’s conviction
that he/she can successfully pursue entrepreneurial outcomes. Some key features of entrepreneurial activities that
generally motivate people with entrepreneurial mind-set to become self-employed include freedom of owning
one’s business, profit orientation, working in a hassle-free environment, having financial independence or control
over compensation, satisfaction gained from the self-esteem as a fulfillment of creating something you can claim
ownership to, control over working conditions, and job security to improve their livelihoods and lifestyles. In
Ghana, many entrepreneurs set up SMEs because it creates a sense of practical optimism, since people believe that
going into business is an effective means of escaping poverty, becoming self-sufficient through financial stability
and/or prosperity.
Entrepreneurship simply means firms' risk-taking activities in terms of business start-ups, facility investment,
businesses expansion, foreign branch opening, and managerial innovation. Unlike the public sector and other
176
private sector enterprises such as philanthropic organisations, entrepreneurship is the capacity and willingness to
take the risk to develop, organise and manage a business venture for the purpose of making profit, by doing things
differently and/or better. Business start-ups is a significant indicator for measuring entrepreneurship and its
characteristics.
Taking entrepreneurial action involves the creation of new products, services or processes and entry into new
markets. It also involves risk-taking because the risks and uncertainties in business start-ups are numerous and
varied. An entrepreneur’s cognitive adaptability describes the extent to which he/she is dynamic, flexible, self-
regulating and engages in the process of generating multiple decision frameworks, as well as how he/she is
focused on sensing and processing changes in their environments and then act on them (Hisrich, Peters &
Shepherd, 2013). There is a growing body of literature on the different perspectives on entrepreneurship. Many
studies on entrepreneurship have examined entrepreneurs’ individual characteristics such as personality,
educational background and attainment, ethnicity, and other relevant characteristics and some studies focus on
investigating the business factors of entrepreneurship by closely examining entrepreneurs’ business financing,
venture capital, industrial relationships and organisational mechanisms (Mack & Qain, 2016). Other researchers also
interested in population, gender, industrial structure, geography (urban and rural), human/social capital, research &
development (R&D), creativity and regional economic studies have dealt with local environments and regional
variations that influence entrepreneurship and the relationship between business start-ups and location factors.
(Acs &Armington, 2006). Whereas in many developed countries, areas with more specialised and educated
workforce is a crucial location factor for entrepreneurship and venture business set ups (Ki, 2008), in developing
countries like Ghana, business start-ups could be based on population distribution and the rural/urban dichotomy,
which is mainly due to factors such as availability of sources of funding and market opportunities. Hence, urban
areas are more likely to attract more business-start-ups than in the rural communities.
Other studies on entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial orientation tend to focus on business processes in terms of
combining the factors of production (capital, machinery/equipment, labour), and on business start-ups, risk-taking,
and the ability to effectively manage a business by seeking investment and market opportunities for profit-making
or financial independence. Griffin, Ebert and Starke (2013) for example, define entrepreneurship as “the act of
assuming the risk of business ownership with the primary goal of making profit through growth and expansion.
This view implies assuming risk and responsibility in taking the initiative to design and implement a strategic
business plan to take advantage of a business opportunity to create value”. The idea of creating value is a process
through which entrepreneurs identify opportunities, allocate resources to create value for customers, and is often
through the identification of unmet customers/public needs or opportunities for change in customer demands and
wealth creation.
Zimmerer, Scarborough and Wilson (2008), also define an entrepreneur as “one who creates a new business in the
face of risk and uncertainty for the purpose of achieving profit and growth by identifying significant opportunities
and assembling the necessary resources to capitalise on them.” Suleiman (2006) on the one hand, argues that
entrepreneurship is “the willingness and ability of an individual to seek opportunities for investment to create and
run a business successfully,” while Drucker (2006) on the other hand, states that entrepreneurship is a distinct
feature, whereby an entrepreneur is a person who understands business opportunities and its benefits, by
177
harnessing scarce resources and utilising them profitably. He/she makes progress in the productivity of resources by
searching changes (or risks), responding to, and employing opportunities. This study adds that the concept of
entrepreneurship also entails the dynamism, capacity and willingness to organise social and economic mechanisms
to turn resources and situations into incremental wealth creation by operating and managing a business venture,
and assuming all its attendant risks to create value, while seeking profit as the ultimate reward. Furthermore, it
involves various aspects of an entrepreneur’s social, economic and spatial activity patterns, and denotes companies’
risk-taking tendency in terms of business start-ups, facility investment, and expansion of new and existing
businesses and managerial innovation.
In the modern global economic system, entrepreneurs creatively exploit changes in the world to put their dexterity
and ingenuity into practice for economic gains. Where others see problems, entrepreneurs recognise opportunities.
Opportunity is situational, since there are no rules regarding where and when an opportunity might appear, so it is
dependent on variable circumstances, in that a problem is one example of an opportunity that entrepreneurs need
to be able to recognise. Another opportunity is a changing situation or trend. As Mariotti and Glackin (2010)
noted, the five roots of opportunity in the marketplace that entrepreneurs can exploit are: problems that a business
can solve; changes in laws, situations or trends; inventions of totally new products and services; competition in
terms of ways to beat the competitor on price, location, quality, reputation, reliability, or speed through which one
can create a very successful business with an existing product or service; and finally technological advances
(scientists may invent technology, but entrepreneurs figure out how to use and sell it). SMEs involve both registered
formal enterprises and informal unregistered enterprises, and are defined in varying terms because of the diverse
nature of the sector.
Generally, the three criteria employed in the classification of SMEs in this study are the firm’s asset base, its
employee size and annual turnover. The National Board for Small Scale Industries (NBSSI) for example, applies both
the ‘fixed asset and employee size criteria, and regards an SME as one employing 29 or fewer employees (NBSSI
Report, 2011).
1
The objective of this studyis therefore to discuss the challenges that hinder entrepreneurship and SMEs
development and how governments in frontier and emerging economies could increase their financial and logistics
support for new entrepreneurs and SMEs in order to help empower them in their business start-up strategies to
develop and transform their business ideas into an opportunity. This could be achieved through state agencies’ role
in facilitating initiatives to help entrepreneurs gain the necessary competencies (knowledge, values, and managerial
skills) essential for understanding business start-ups and SMEs management for productivity, sustainability and
profitability leading to wealth creation and economic growth. To this end, the questions to be addressed in this
study is, what challenges face Ghanaian entrepreneurs and SMEs and how could they be addressed appropriately?
How could new entrepreneurs and existing SMEs be supported by governments to make the private sector the
engine of growth in developing countries’ economies? Following from the above questions, the study argues that
1
The United Nations Industrial Development Organisation’s (UNIDO) standards for classifying large firms in
developing countries are those with more than 100 employees, medium firms in the range of 20-99 employees, small
firms as having 5 to 19 employees, and micro firms with less than 5 staff. The NBSSI’s criterion is in line with the
UNIDO criteria and Steel and Webster’s (1990) definition of SMEs in Ghana as one with 30 or less employees.
178
regardless of the financial assistance for business start-ups and training new entrepreneurs receive from
governments in some developing countries, the support is woefully inadequate to enable them compete with SMEs
and large firms in developed countries. As a result, many entrepreneurs and SMEs face a myriad of challenges such
as lack of financial support and the necessary training to manage their enterprises successfully. The
recommendation section in the study discusses the uniqueness of the relationship between business start-ups and
business management on how to start, grow/expand the business, and how governments in developing countries
could support private sector capacity building for new entrepreneurs and existing SMEs, which is the engine of
growth for every economy, and some key tips on how potential entrepreneurs could transform their business ideas
into reality.
Chia sẻ với bạn bè của bạn: |